Posts Tagged Authorities
Municipal Accountability: a city council’s refusal to account
Posted by Henry McCandless in Accountability of Public Administration Academics, Authorities' Accountabilities, Governance Accountabilities on June 30, 2010
In the August 19 2009 edition of a Victoria BC local newspaper, the Oak Bay News, I had set out the problem of the mushrooming and unfettered deer population in Victoria and what I saw as the Oak Bay municipal council’s responsibility. In that op-ed I stated:
“If Council members say they can do nothing because removal (of the deer) is a provincial matter, they can be expected to meet with other municipal councillors, the deer-housing golf clubs and responsible provincial ministry and wildlife protection officials and come up with an effective action plan within four months. This would be exposed to the public for challenge and would include options such as removal or culling and the reasons for it. Oak Bay Council owes homeowners a public explanation of its intentions and reasons with respect to the deer.”
Seeing no public response from the council members, I wrote on April 16 2010 to each of the seven Oak Bay councillors specifically asking them to publicly explain to Oak Bay residents their action plan to deal with the problem.
My August 2009 op-ed, April 2010 letter to the Councillors and the response are set out below.
Public Trust Depends on Public Accountability
Without public trust in authorities, society doesn’t work properly.
The argument for requiring full and fair public explanation by authorities on how they are carrying out their responsibilities is straight-forward: If authorities are required to explain publicly, fully and fairly, before taking their decisions:
- what specific outcomes they intend to bring about, for whom, and why,
- the performance standards they intend for themselves and those they oversee,
their decision-making will be fairer for all those who would be significantly affected by their decisions.
This is because authorities’ explanations required before the fact can be publicly evaluated by knowledgeable organizations for their fairness and completeness. This public assessment will lead to greater or lower public trust in the authority. Thus the requirement for public explanation produces a self-regulating influence that increases decision fairness and raises valid citizen trust in the authority.
But it will take citizens themselves to bring about public accounting to a standard of explanation that citizens are entitled to see met. Since the obligation of authorities to give full and fair public accountings is unassailable, there is no barrier to citizens forming accountability groups on important issues and holding their elected representatives publicly to account for making the explanation requirement the law.
Recent Comments